HOME The Firm Attorneys In The News Have A Case? Refer A Case Contact Us Legal Tips Where We Are


Drums woman negligent; family awarded $1.7M
by Paul Krupski, Standard-Speaker

A Luzerne County jury found Judith McGuinness, 74, was negligent when her car struck and killed Joann Torres, and awarded damages totaling $1.7 million.

WILKES-BARRE - A jury Monday night found Judith McGuinness of drums was negligent when her car struck and killed 3-year-old Joann Torres on North Church Street in Hazleton on Dec. 16, 1997 and awarded damages totaling $1,700,000.

The verdict, reached at 10:30 p.m. after almost five hours of deliberations, ended a four-day civil lawsuit trial before Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan.

The jury found no negligence by the victim's mother, Maruja Arce, named an additional defendant by the defendant's lawyer, who alleged she was culpable for not properly supervising the safety of her daughter.

The victim's estate was awarded $150,000 for pain and suffering prior to her death and $650,000 for lost earning capacity. An expert had estimated her life expectancy at 77 years. The mother was awarded $400,000 for pain and suffering and $300,000 for future pain and suffering. Her daughter, Amanda, 7, who witnessed the tragedy, was awarded $100,000 for past pain and suffering and $100,000 for future pain and suffering.

Lawyers representing Arce, 24, of 52 N. Laurel St., alleged that McGuinness, 74, of 220 Four Seasons Drive, Beech Mountain Lakes, was visually impaired and hadn't turned on her car's headlights. They said she was virtually blind in her left eye from a childhood injury and suffered from decreased peripheral vision of the right eye.

They claimed the young victim was "knocked out of her shoes" by the car's right front bumper after she had taken one step off a curb into a crosswalk beneath a street light at Fern Street.

Defense lawyer Thomas Comerford admitted his client's left eye vision was 20/200 but said her right eye vision was 20/20 when she wore her glasses. He said she was licensed to drive and, by law, needed to be able to see with one eye to drive.

He questioned why the victim was the only member of a party of six people to be in the street and how a 3-year-old takes one step off a curb and advances a "quarter of the way across into the front of a vehicle."

Comerford said, 'I think Joann got excited, ran into the street and into the side of vehicle."

The mother said her right hand had hold of Joann and she was holding the hand of her daughter, Amanda, with her left hand as they prepared to cross the street. A cousin, Luis Ruiz, who was visiting from Puerto Rico, had her youngest daughter, Christine, 1 1/2, by the hand and was carrying her infant son, Edwin, she said.

The family said they were walking to a pizza parlor and decided to cross to see a lighted Christmas tree in a nearby park.

McGuinness said she was wearing her bifocals and had turned on the headlights when she left the Giant Market to go to visit her husband, who was hospitalized.

She said she was watching the road and looking ahead to the traffic light at Diamond Avenue and didn't see six people standing on the curb. She said she heard a thumping noise coming from the side of her vehicle, swerved, stopped in the southbound lane and looked back.

McGuinness said she took Arce, who had picked up her injured daughter and pleaded for a ride to a hospital, to Hazleton-St. Joseph Medical Center.

A police accident reconstruction expert placed the point of impact at the intersection. McGuinness, while testifying, said the accident could have happened before the intersection.

Comerford contended, "We have a general zone of where the accident occurred but no physical evidence to pinpoint the exact locale." Comerford maintained the girl ran into the side of the car and was knocked violently to the ground, striking her head and suffering a fatal skull fracture. Arce said her daughter's head was on the curb and her body was on the street when she picked her up.

Arce filed a wrongful death and survival lawsuit in October 1998. Attorney Robert Powell is representing her. The defendant's lawyer filed a cross claim in November.

Attorney Neil O'Donnell, who represented Arce as an additional defendant, contended the cross claim was a litigation tactic aimed to put the mother through 17 months of psychological terror. He said Comerford asked to end the action on the first day of the trial, but the judge denied the request. Comerford maintained the purpose of the cross claim was to determine if Arce was negligent in supervising the child.

"We offered to withdraw it because we felt we had no evidence to show she was," he stated.

O'Donnell claimed McGuinness came forward with four new facts when she testified on Friday. He said she claimed Ruiz had threatened her but she never told that to police and that Ruiz wasn't asked about the alleged threats when he testified.

She claimed the intersection wasn't the accident scene but didn't tell anyone, he said, and that her claim the mother carrying the victim came from behind her car wasn't reported to investigators or mentioned in her deposition.

Finally, he said she claimed the hood of a jacket worn by one of the children was up. O'Donnell asserted, "If you don't see the children, how could you see the hood. The hood was down. She was thinking on her feet."

O'Donnell described McGuinness as a "non-compliant patient" who didn't go back to an eye doctor after a 1996 visit determined she was developing cataracts of both eyes. McGuinness driving at night was a time bomb. O'Donnell said, "This defendant gambled and Joann Torres lost."

 


For more info, please call 570.708.1LAW (1529)
or email info@powell-group.com

Home | The Firm | Attorneys | In The News | Have A Case?
Refer A Case | Contact Us | Legal Tips | Where We Are

DISCLAIMER: The Powell Law Group, P.C. only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney-client relationship, which our web site specifically does not create. Only after having entered into a written, signed agreement with The Powell Law Group, P.C. will an attorney-client relationship have been created. It is imperative that any action taken be done on advice of counsel. Because every case is different, the descriptions of awards and cases previously handled are not meant to be a guarantee of success.


© 1999 The Powell Law Group, P.C. All rights reserved.